For many organisations, people strategy is still treated as a support function — something discussed after growth plans are set, rather than a driver of those plans. But according to Aparna C, a veteran CHRO and organisational strategist with over 25 years of experience, that mindset is exactly what prevents companies from scaling effectively.
Having worked across early-stage startups, large enterprises, and complex transformation environments, Aparna has seen how performance frameworks, culture design, and leadership behaviours can either accelerate growth or quietly undermine it. Her perspective is simple but powerful: growth doesn’t break because of strategy — it breaks because of confusion.
In this conversation, Aparna shares why clarity is the most underrated growth lever, how CXOs must rethink the role of HR, and which cultural behaviors determine whether organisations actually sustain performance during periods of rapid change.
Highlights
Why Clarity — Not Headcount — Drives 2× Growth
Q: As a CHRO, you’ve aligned performance management and KPIs to support significant business growth. What mindset shift do business leaders most underestimate when using people strategy as a growth lever?
A: Most leaders treat people strategy the way they treat a quarterly budget review — they look at the numbers, identify a gap, and demand a fix without examining the underlying cause.
That approach works at 1× growth. It breaks down completely at 2×.
When organisations set aggressive growth targets, the first instinct is to add more — more headcount, more training programs, more engagement initiatives. But the leaders who actually achieve exponential growth don’t start by adding. They start by removing.
Specifically, they remove ambiguity — the silent drag that slows down even the best people every day.
The real shift is this: stop treating clarity as a soft skill and start treating it as a growth lever.
When high performers don’t know exactly what “winning” looks like, they don’t sit idle. They work harder — but often in the wrong direction. In environments where roles are evolving and structures are still settling, that misalignment compounds quickly. You end up with a talented, exhausted team that isn’t moving the needle, and nobody can explain why.
So the first question leaders should ask is not, “How do we get more from our people?”
It’s this: “What are we asking them to carry that has nothing to do with growth?”
That question shifts leadership from applying pressure to providing clarity. And that’s when people strategy actually becomes a growth lever — not through better performance review cycles, but through leaders actively clearing the path for their teams to succeed.
KPIs and performance frameworks matter. But a sharp target inside a confusing environment doesn’t accelerate performance. It accelerates attrition.
From HR Function to Transformation Partner
Q: With more than 25 years of experience across early-stage and mature organizations, how should CXOs rethink the role of HR — from a support function to a true business and transformation partner?
A: The shift can be captured in three practical principles.
First, HR must be invited into strategic conversations before decisions are made, not after.
Second, HR leaders should be measured on business outcomes — not HR metrics alone.
Third, they must be given access to the data, context, and authority to challenge decisions when necessary.
When those conditions exist, HR stops being a support function and becomes a transformation partner.
And often, the reason the transformation actually succeeds.
The Cultural Behaviors That Hold When Pressure Hits
Q: You’ve led culture and capability-building across diverse industries. What are the non-negotiable cultural elements organizations must get right to sustain performance during rapid change?
A: Every organisation says the same things about culture:
“Our people are our greatest asset.”
“We have a culture of innovation.”
“We put employees first.”
Then change arrives — and the real culture reveals itself.
After 25 years of building organisations through transformation, I’ve stopped thinking of culture as a feeling. Culture is a set of observable, repeatable behaviours. Under pressure, those behaviours either hold — or they collapse.
There are four elements that must hold.
1. Truth and transparency must travel fast — especially upward.
In stable environments, organisations can survive when bad news travels slowly. During rapid change, that lag becomes dangerous.
Leaders must feel genuinely safe raising problems in real time — not in town halls or surveys, but in the daily flow of work.
The simplest test is this:
When was the last time someone told you something you didn’t want to hear — and what happened to them afterward?
The answer to the second question reveals the real culture.
2. People must know what “good” looks like right now.
During rapid change, role clarity disappears faster than organisations realise. Job descriptions become outdated, reporting lines shift, and priorities compete.
Your best people — the ones with options — quietly disengage when they no longer know how to succeed.
Leaders must redefine what “good” looks like continuously, in simple language:
- What does a great week look like right now?
- What decisions can you make independently?
- Where are the boundaries?
This isn’t micromanagement. Clarity is what makes autonomy possible.
3. Leaders must be visibly consistent.
Culture is not what leaders say. It’s what leaders do when it’s inconvenient.
When high performers behave badly, and nothing happens, the culture learns that performance excuses behavior. When leaders take credit for their teams’ work without consequence, the culture learns that hierarchy matters more than contribution.
One visible exception at the top can undo years of cultural work.
4. Learning must move faster than change itself.
Most organisations treat learning as a scheduled activity — a training program, a certification, or an offsite.
In fast-changing environments, that model is already too slow.
Learning must become part of everyday work: quick post-mortems, leaders openly discussing mistakes, teams pausing to adapt after major initiatives.
The organisations that sustain performance aren’t the ones that never stumble. They’re the ones who recover faster than everyone else.
The Leadership Behavior That Separates Great Organizations
Q: Having worked closely with CXOs, what leadership behavior consistently differentiates high-performing organizations from the rest?
A: The leaders who build durable, high-performing organisations anchor their decisions on purpose — not pressure.
Employee advocacy does not mean lowering expectations. It means building environments where high standards and high support coexist.
That requires three things:
- Clarity of expectations
- Transparency in metrics
- Psychological safety to discuss constraints openly
High-performance cultures fail when leaders choose extremes.
Some protect people from accountability. Others protect numbers at the expense of people.
Neither approach works.
The real balance is this: keep the target, but redesign the path to get there.
High standards. High support. The goal stays the same — but the system around people becomes strong enough to achieve it.
Final Thoughts: Why Growth Begins With Leadership Clarity
In conversations about transformation, organisations often focus on technology, strategy, and market positioning. But Aparna C believes the real bottleneck is far simpler — and far harder to address.
Clarity.
When leaders remove ambiguity, define success in real time, and model consistent behaviour under pressure, culture becomes an operational advantage rather than a slogan.
In that environment, performance frameworks work, KPIs drive progress, and teams move with confidence.
Because ultimately, a people strategy does not create growth by itself.
Leaders do — when they choose clarity over complexity, accountability over slogans, and systems that allow their people to win.
Highlights
Read the Chinese article here.
